A Controversial Issue of Nebraska Pipeline Has Again Been Put in the Agenda
Next Post

Press {{ keys }} + D to make this page bookmarked.


A Controversial Issue of Nebraska Pipeline Has Again Been Put in the Agenda


LINCOLN – August 20, 2018

The issue of a pipeline crossing Nebraska and apparently causing damage to the environment has again been put in the agenda by the activists and the officials, local media reports.

A federal judge has ordered the U.S. State Department to conduct a more thorough review of the Keystone XL pipeline's proposed pathway after Nebraska state regulators changed the route, raising the possibility of further delays to a project first proposed in 2008.

U.S. District Judge Brian Morris in Great Falls said in a ruling Wednesday that the State Department must supplement its 2014 environmental impact study of the project to consider the new route. Morris declined to strike down the federal permit for the project, approved by President Donald Trump in March 2017.

The Nebraska Public Service Commission rejected pipeline developer TransCanada's preferred route in November 2017, but approved a different pathway that stretches farther to the east. The "mainline alternative" route is five miles longer than the company's preferred route, cuts through six different Nebraska counties and runs parallel to an existing TransCanada-owned pipeline for 89 miles.

State Department officials "have yet to analyze the mainline alternative route," Morris wrote in his ruling. The State Department has "the obligation to analyze new information relevant to the environmental impacts of its decision."

Author: USA Really