Unfair Play: Biological Male Wins Women’s World Championship Cycling Event
CALIFORNIA – October 15, 2018
Feminism, as we know, denies the existence of gender differences. This principle has become the basis of political trends in recent years. But nature puts everything in its place and the twisted logic of feminism has cracked from an unexpected side. As they say, when it rains, it pours.
Transgender people have begun to push for people to compete in sports according to whatever gender they feel like. It is enough for a man to declare that he feels like a woman and he has the right to participate in sports competitions as a woman. It’s nonsense from a biological point of view, but who cares when it comes to politics?
Now, a biological male who identifies as a transgender woman won a women’s world championship cycling event Sunday in California.
Meet Rachel V. McKinnon — an assistant professor of philosophy at the College of Charleston in South Carolina.
He says he’s now a female and so he’s allowed to compete against women in sports. Rachel McKinnon won the women’s 35-39 age bracket at the 2018 UCI Masters Track Cycling World Championships in Los Angeles.
McKinnon, representing Canada, bested Carolien Van Herrikhuyzen of the Netherlands and American cyclist Jennifer Wagner to take first place in the given age range for the Union Cycliste Internationale event.
McKinnon celebrated the victory on Twitter, writing: “First transgender woman world champion … ever.” Later, the professor responded to criticism from “transphobic bigots” by tweeting:
Lots of transphobic bigots are responding to my world championship win saying that 'Next up, the paralympics.' Hey women, you realize that ALL of these people (many of them women) are comparing you to disabled people...right? Women = 'disabled men' they think. Wow. Offensive. pic.twitter.com/K5cbZgaOMc— Dr. Rachel McKinnon (@rachelvmckinnon) October 14, 2018
Allowing biological males who identify as transgender women to compete in women’s athletic events has been a controversial subject, as critics argue that it puts female competitors at an inherent disadvantage.
McKinnon did not immediately return an email seeking comment for this report.
In January, USA Today quoted McKinnon as arguing against requiring biological males to suppress testosterone as a requirement for competing against women.
“We cannot have a woman legally recognized as a trans woman in society, and not be recognized that way in sports,” McKinnon told the newspaper, adding, “Focusing on performance advantage is largely irrelevant because this is a rights issue. We shouldn’t be worried about trans people taking over the Olympics. We should be worried about their fairness and human rights instead.”
McKinnon compared restrictions on the inclusion of biological males in women’s sports events to racial segregation.
“This is bigger than sports and it’s about human rights,” McKinnon told USA Today.
“By catering to cisgender people’s views, that furthers transgender people’s oppression. When it comes to extending rights to a minority population, why would we ask the majority? I bet a lot of white people were pissed off when we desegregated sports racially and allowed black people. But they had to deal with it.”
The feminist contagion has penetrated so deeply that boys can now simply claim to be girls and “win” anywhere. Biologically speaking, normal women have no chance of competing with men in skirts.
Such men actually steal the sports glory from the women who truly deserve it. It is absolutely shameless how they take the top awards and cash prizes and other benefits. Real female athletes are unable to get a variety of scholarships while transgender athletes take them.
If someone claims he feel like a child will he be able to compete against children? What if he claims to be a little girls? How should other girls react to such competition?
So, there is no real competition in women’s sports anymore, because men are doing the winning anyways.
Biological women claiming to be males also participate in male competitions but they always lose to the biological men. Even drugs, chemicals, and stimulants cannot help them, because you cannot fool nature.
Thus, women are finding themselves in trouble with their feministic innovations. This makes many critical of the theory of universal sexual equality.