Copy-paste error reveals Assange already facing US indictment
Next Post

Press {{ keys }} + D to make this page bookmarked.


Copy-paste error reveals Assange already facing US indictment


The US Department of Justice is gearing up for a prosecution of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange and is now "optimistic" about the prospect of doing so, according to a new report citing "people in Washington familiar with the matter."

WASHINGTON, DC – November 17, 2018

Mere hours after the Wall Street Journal reported that the DOJ was preparing to indict Wikileaks' founder Julian Assange, the Washington Post discovered that Assange has already been charged under seal by the Eastern District of Virginia, which has been handling the years-long probe into Wikileaks' disclosures of classified government information.

The revelation was apparently the result of a copy-and-paste error in another, unrelated, court filing, according to Seamus Hughes. That case involved Seitu Sulayman Kokayi, a 29-year-old who had been charged with both enticing a 15-year-old girl into sex by sending her pornographic images while also having "substantial interest in terrorist acts."

Assistant US Attorney Kellen S. Dwyer, urging a judge to keep the matter sealed, wrote that “due to the sophistication of the defendant and the publicity surrounding the case, no other procedure is likely to keep confidential the fact that Assange has been charged.” Later, Dwyer wrote the charges would “need to remain sealed until Assange is arrested.”

That Kokayi case involved previously classified information and prosecutors were planning to use information obtained under the FISA act. Kokayi was indicted last week and is set to be arraigned on Friday. His case has been sealed since September.

Since the revelation was made in error, no other details about the charges against Assange were revealed.

Dwyer is also assigned to the WikiLeaks case. People familiar with the matter said what Dwyer was disclosing was true, but unintentional.

Joshua Stueve, a spokesman for EDVA, said "the court filing was made in error. That was not the intended name for this filing."

Assuming he is charged, it's still not clear whether Assange will wind up in a US courtroom to face trial. He has been living in the Ecuador Embassy in London since 2012, fearing he’ll be arrested if he steps outside.

One of Assange's lawyers, Barry J. Pollack, told the Post that "the only thing more irresponsible than to charge someone for publishing accurate information would be to put in a public document information that was clearly not intended for the public and without warning Assange.”

"Obviously, I have no idea if they have really accused him or what, but the idea that federal crimes can be imputed for publishing truthful information is a dangerous precedent," he added.

Assange has fallen out with the government of Ecuador under its current president, Lenin Moreno, who came into power in May 2017. Moreno has described Assange as a "stone in our shoe" because of the high profile leaks he has published, including emails belonging to the Democratic National Committee (DNC), which Wikileaks released in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. Assange's take-no-prisoners method of dealing with world governments has put him between a rock and a hard place in the embassy, and on thin ice in terms of his asylum.

More than that, Assange sued the government in an Ecuadorian court after the embassy cut off his internet access and took other punitive measures reportedly in response to his slovenly habits and penchant for food-mooching. But he lost the suit and is now appealing.

When he first sought asylum in the embassy, he was facing possible extradition to Sweden in a sex crimes case. He has argued that that case was a pretext for what he predicted would be his arrest and extradition to the United States.

In the years since, the Swedish case has been closed, but Assange has said he cannot risk leaving the embassy because the United States would attempt to have him arrested and extradited for disclosures of government secrets. Throughout that time, the United States has refused to say whether there are any sealed charges against Assange.

If Assange were to leave the embassy and be arrested by British authorities, he would likely still fight extradition in the British courts.

The DOJ has for years refused to reveal whether charges have been pending against Assange under seal, though it was widely believed that they were. But. seeing as filings like Dwyer's are probably vetted by multiple readers, the fact that an error of such magnitude was allowed to be made is almost suspicious in and of itself, particularly considering the timing with other reports about the DOJ's efforts to indict Assange (before leaving office, Attorney General Jeff Sessions had confirmed that arresting Assange remained "a priority").

It's almost as if somebody had tried to warn him (Assange and Wikileaks have also been cited as unindicted co-conspirators in indictments against a Russian troll farm handed down by the Mueller probe).

Author: USA Really