Stories
U.S. Attorney Agrees to Present Extensive Evidence of Explosive Destruction of World Trade Center on 9/11
Next Post

Press {{ keys }} + D to make this page bookmarked.

Close
Photo: lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/PrtSc

U.S. Attorney Agrees to Present Extensive Evidence of Explosive Destruction of World Trade Center on 9/11

1034

NEW YORK – December 3, 2018

17 years after the 9/11 tragedy in NY when over 2,000 innocent civilians were murdered and hundreds of First Responders also died while selflessly attempting to save others, more than 3,000 architects & engineers are calling for a new investigation into the destruction of all 3 WTC skyscrapers on 9/11.

In the aftermath of September 11, 2001, Congress initiated the “Joint Inquiry” and the government eventually also created the 9/11 Commission to investigate and explain what had occurred. Almost immediately, and in the years thereafter, serious questions were raised about both the Joint House and Senate Intelligence Committees’ Inquiry and the 9/11 Commission’s version of the events surrounding 9/11. Many observers, including notably the families of the victims, criticized both inquiries for failing to address key questions.

The official explanation of the events on and surrounding 9/11 has not been established in a court of law or by an objective and thorough investigation by either Congress or the 9/11 Commission.

On November 26, a nonprofit public interest organization The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, announced its receipt of a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in response to the Lawyers’ Committee’s April 10, 2018 Petition and July 30, 2018 Amended Petition demanding that the U.S. Attorney present to a Special Grand Jury extensive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted federal crimes relating to the destruction of three World Trade Center Towers on 9/11 (WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7). 

The U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman, in his November 7, 2018 letter to the Lawyers’ Committee, stated: “We have received and reviewed The Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc.'s submissions of April 10 and July 30, 2018. We will comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3332 as they relate to your submissions”.

The U.S. Attorney’s letter does not spell out the steps that will be taken to comply, but 18 U.S.C. § 3332 is clear as to what these steps must be. This law states: “[a]ny such [United States] attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other person, inform the [Special] grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of such other person, and such attorney's action or recommendation.” This law also states that “(a) It shall be the duty of each such [special] grand jury impaneled within any judicial district to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district.”

The Lawyers’ Committee’s April 10th 52-page original Petition was accompanied by 57 exhibits and presented extensive evidence that explosives were used to destroy three WTC buildings. That evidence included independent scientific laboratory analysis of WTC dust samples showing the presence of high-tech explosives and/or incendiaries; numerous first-hand reports by First Responders of explosions at the WTC on 9/11; expert analysis of seismic evidence that explosions occurred at the WTC towers on 9/11 prior to the airplane impacts and prior to the building collapses; and expert analysis by architects, engineers, and scientists concluding that the rapid onset symmetrical near-free-fall acceleration collapse of three WTC high rise buildings on 9/11 exhibited the key characteristics of controlled demolition.

The Lawyers’ Committee’s July 30th Amended Petition addresses several additional federal crimes beyond the federal bombing crime addressed in the original Petition. The Lawyers’ Committee concluded in the petitions that explosive and incendiary devices preplaced at the WTC were detonated causing the complete collapse of the WTC Twin Towers on 9/11 and increasing the tragic loss of life. 

Attorney Mick Harrison, Litigation Director, stated: “The failure of our government to diligently investigate this disturbing evidence has contributed to the erosion of trust in our institutions. The Lawyers’ Committee felt it was out duty as public citizens to submit this evidence to the U.S. Attorney for submission to the Special Grand Jury.”

Attorney David Meiswinkle, President of the Lawyers’ Committee’s Board of Directors, stated: “We have offered to assist the U.S. Attorney in the presentation of this evidence to a Special Grand Jury. We have also requested that Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth provide us expert support in the hope that our organizations will be invited to make a joint presentation of relevant evidence to the Special Grand Jury.”

Attorney William Jacoby, Lawyers’ Committee Board Member, stated: “We call upon the public and legal community to contact us and support our efforts to contribute to this grand jury process and to monitor and ensure compliance by the Justice Department.”

On November 30, a team of four civil engineers from the Project Due Diligence including members Roland Angle and Dr. Oswald Rendon-Herrero together with civil engineers Jef Bishop and Larry Cooper hosted a special presentation after that day's program of the ASCE's Forensic Engineering 8th Congress in Austin, Texas. Once every three years, the American Society of Civil Engineers holds its “Forensic Engineering Congress,” considered the leading event for forensic engineering professionals worldwide.

The presentation was given by civil engineer Roland Angle, who is the leader of Project Due Diligence. Project Due Diligence is a coordinated effort by a team of engineers around the world to engage the profession in performing its due diligence regarding the official reports on the three catastrophic building failures that occurred on September 11, 2001.

USA Really previously published an article presenting new additional information from eyewitnesses and a half-hour long video from former CBS reporter Mark LaGanga.

The video has been viewed almost 600,000 times. The publishing of the video was agreed upon with the Secret Service but YouTube has removed it “due to a copyright claim by a third party”.

As USA Really wrote, there are more and more people questioning the official version of the events surrounding 9/11. Hopefully the first step taken by U.S. Attorney toward prosecuting the explosive destruction of World Trade Center will bring transparency and accountability under the law, regarding the unprosecuted crimes of 9/11.

Author: USA Really