Stories
Sovereignty Against Globalism: The Main 21st Century Dilemma
Next Post

Press {{ keys }} + D to make this page bookmarked.

Close
Photo: prod-upp-image-read.ft.com/PrtSc

Sovereignty Against Globalism: The Main 21st Century Dilemma

6382

WASHINGTON - February 1, 2019

"We are currently cooperating with anyone who can make the entire world States forget about the mysterious force called sovereignty. And we constantly deny what we do in reality," said Arnold Joseph Toynbee.

Toynbee headed Chatham House for thirty years -- the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), the main West "think tank." And in a unique way it combined the qualities of the deepest academic scientist and experienced political swindler, puppeteer, on account of which dozens, if not hundreds of different subversive special operations. He knew what he was talking about.

What is globalization and how does it relate to sovereignty? Schematically, it looks like a combination of two phenomena.

The first phenomenon is of geopolitical origin and is called "glocalization." It denotes erosion and destruction of states and sovereignties with the transfer of state powers and prerogatives upwards -- in global and regional (uniting several countries within the region) structures and downwards, in local -- domestic regions and municipalities.

The second phenomenon is related to the civilization factor, which is "fragmentation" -- identities fragmentation combined with the integration of economies. Moreover, any identity -- civilizational (religious and cultural), national, social, political, ideological -- is fragmented. And its fragmented in order to strike out any self from them, replacing it with an economy that will lead to a single denominator, which is from the Western test tubes.

In other words, the globalization goal is to destroy and dismantle all communities -- from family to state. To destroy all forms of collective consciousness, to pit them against each other, to divide them, to organize the war chaos of all against all, and then to sit atop the pyramid, managing the contradictions of cogs and atoms, rubbing his hands and pouring oil on the fire.

Who is responsible for globalization?

As American explorer Nicholas Hagger said, "The only way to realize the United World standard is the globalist phase of development of one of the powerful civilizations. If North American civilization becomes openly imperialist and decides to create a Confederate Empire aka American type, this standard may exist throughout the expansionist phase of its development."

Sovereignty Against Globalism: The Main 21st Century Dilemma

Do you see what is it about? It’s about the "globalist phase" of civilizational development -- it is also "expansionist." Hagger is right here in that globalism is a certain phase of development of a certain civilization.

He is mistaken in another point: There is no "North American" civilization, but the Western one. And its former Christian continental centers are now controlled by the occult, Masonic-Protestant, island Anglo-Saxon periphery.

But in reality globalization can be carried out on the basis of any ideology.

The "world revolution" is also a form of globalization. In February 1965, Ernesto Che Guevara, in his famous Algerian speech, called for socialist globalization. But in reality, only the capitalist West has globalization resources. Even the "world revolution" he adapted to his project tasks, transforming it from Trotskyism into neo-conservatism in the form of "global democratic revolution." It's called also the "Arab spring."

"Within ten years, we intend to create a free trade zone between the United States and the Middle East ... As long as the Middle East remains a place where freedom doesn't flourish, it will remain a place of stagnation, discontent and violence, ready for export ... The global democratic revolution is a huge and difficult undertaking, but it is worth our efforts and our sacrifices because we know what is at stake.

The failure of Iraqi democracy will inspire terrorists around the world, increase the danger to the American people and deprive millions of their hopes. Iraqi democracy will win -- and this victory will send the message from Damascus to Tehran that freedom can be the future of every nation. The creation of a free Iraq in the heart of the Middle East will be a turning point for the global democratic revolution," Bush Jr. said at the time.

Sovereignty Against Globalism: The Main 21st Century Dilemma

You say, lovely thoughts, but it's history. That was said about Damascus and Tehran fifteen years ago. And what are we seeing today? The times change, and presidents and ruling parties with it. But strategy doesn't change. This is a sure sign of the existence of concept centers that have guided the process from decade to decade, or rather, from century to century.

It should be noted the basic principle of conceptual "shadow" control is "two hands controlled by one head." In practical politics, these are the two-party Western systems. Remember Karl Marx? The bourgeois oligarchy governs, shifting power from one hand to the other and back. Marx understood and described this principle of oligarchic power in the middle of the 19th century.

And bipartisanship, in turn, is a visible reflection of the liberal-socialist (or left-liberal) consensus. The right flank of these systems is controlled with liberal international, a left-socialist international. Both headquarters are in London. As they say, are there any questions? Or is there finally an understanding that the Western election campaign is a show of "nanai boys moving up?"

If to clarify, where the idea of this “left-liberal” consensus is from, the answer is found in very well-informed, and open to mason sources. Bipartisanship is the principle of partnership in bourgeois competition. By the way, the center of regular Freemasonry is the same as with London in 1717, with the formation of the Grand London Lodge (now the Grand Lodge of England). The connection of Freemasonry with the British monarchy was established in 1583. In 1689, with the accession of the Protestant House of Orange-Nassau, the monarch conquered the Church of England.

Sovereignty Against Globalism: The Main 21st Century Dilemma

One would like to emphasize the bourgeois beginning of this model. It links capitalism to Protestantism and Freemasonry. The Anglican creed is a mixture of Protestantism and Catholicism; thus it "crept" to the Vatican, within which the Jesuits stand on this Ecumenical platform. And it's not by chance that they're now in power there. Today, the Masonic and therefore anti-Christian Union of the West is personified by the World Council of Churches (WCC) with its Ecumenical Charter (2001) and the decisions of the second Vatican Council (1962-1965), which formed the platform of "Judeo-Christianity" as the basis of the Ecumenical "new world religion."

Now back to the 19th century, in the Victorian era, which takes the count the idea of spreading the British parliamentary-monarchical system to the whole world.

"The settlement of British colonists in the whole of Africa, the Holy Land, the valley of the Euphrates, the Islands of Cyprus and Crete, all of South America, the Pacific Islands, the entire Malay archipelago, the coastline of China and Japan and the return of the United States of America in the British Empire... the Establishment of a world Empire with a global Imperial Parliament," said Cecil John Rhodes, founder of Rhodesia and the diamond monopoly De Beers, the initiator of the Boer War.

Sovereignty Against Globalism: The Main 21st Century Dilemma

There’s a disciple of Benjamin Disraeli, the first Prime Minister who combined Protestant religious affiliation with Jewish origin, as well as Lionel Rothschild, the leader of the third generation of the British branch of this dynasty, the first religious Jew, awarded the aristocratic title of peer and chair in the House of Lords. "The return of the United States to the British Empire," which Rhodes referred to, is, of course, allegorical. This was done with the creation of the Federal Reserve System (Fed) and we will see what this meant.

In parallel, the process of European integration was launched. In accordance with the principle of "two hands that are managed by one head,” two projects were put forward: Paneuropa, Austrian diplomat, count and Mason Richard Coudenhove-Hungary; the Nazi, and the quasi-Masonic (in 1932, before coming to power, the Nazis opened the Museum of Freemasonry in sacred for them Nuremberg, in 1935, banned the box, forcing their members to join the SS).

But Nazism has the same split. The racial project of Hitler-Rosenberg opposed the SS cosmopolitan project. Communication cosmopolitanism with the Vatican and through it with the ecumenical centers of the West after the war was made through the Franco regime, the papal order Opus Dei and the Alliance of the Vatican with Washington in Latin America, where Nazi criminals escaped to. Today's European Union is a copy of the SS project.

"Germany is waging this war to create a European Confederation as an associative and socialist community of the peoples of Europe. ...The refusal of all claims to German supremacy outside the natural ethnic boundaries of the settlement of the German people. ... The establishment of the United States of Europe on the basis of the equal rights of all its constituent peoples. Submission of all national points of view of this great common goal," says the document of the Supreme SS Command.

And so what is globalization?

Let's imagine the globe, on the one hand divided into states with their borders and vertical hierarchies, each with its own, and on the other, surrounded by the contours of global cross-border relations. Verticals ensure sovereignty, horizontal -- blur and undermine it, getting through borders and involving the internal elements into external processes to bypass the verticals and others hierarchies. This is the whole point of the so-called "civil society." This is not a “society of citizens,” as we are told, but a set of members of NPOs and NGOs that are supported by certain oligarchic funds.

Sovereignty Against Globalism: The Main 21st Century Dilemma

Horizontally, these NPOs and NGOs are managed by external centers located in the West or in dependent countries. And such external centers form a hierarchy, the influence of which extends along the contours, which are controlled by these centers. And then one wonders why American laws in third countries so easily grab, take to the United States, judge and imprison citizens of others countries? That's why.

The only way to exclude this influence is to block and break the horizontal lines on its borders, not letting them influence inside the country. That is to be closed from the infamous "open society.” In particular, to limit the notorious "departure freedom,” which already exists not for everyone, but only for those who have money.

Against whom would globalization be directed

There is a project theory, that its essence is that each major civilization in the process of its development forms a civilizational project, which is based on the civilizational idea, closely related to traditional religion and manifests itself in values. Each such civilization has its own spiritual value; that is why the globalist demagoguery is trying to break them, replacing them with utilitarian, thoroughly material, so-called "universal values."

Sovereignty Against Globalism: The Main 21st Century Dilemma

The largest civilizations, preserved for centuries, in their development are moving from project to project, forming a chain of projects -- project continuity. And these chains are in a state of continuous competition and struggle for survival.

Only two civilizations developed such "chains"--the West and Russia, as analysts says. And it is their confrontation that is the main content of the entire history of the second half of the second millennium. Each of these two chains went through project "reincarnation" three times, putting forward four projects:

West: from Catholic (Latin) to capitalist (Protestant), further to liberal (imperialist) and from it to Western (Anglo-Saxon);

Russia: from Kiev to Moscow, then to the Russian Empire. And from it to bypassing the timelessness of the "Provisional government," to the USSR, the Great Red Project.

So, the "new world order," globalization, global fascism, cosmopolitan, devoid of civilizational, national and even ethnic coloring, from the point of view of both scientific methodology and practical policy, is the fifth project of Western Continuity.

And now the most important thing.

First: The First World War was unleashed shortly after the creation of the Fed. Taking control of the world's finances, the world oligarchic bourgeoisie went for world power. That is, globalization was launched.

Sovereignty Against Globalism: The Main 21st Century Dilemma

Second: The war was unleashed for the collapse of the Russian, German, Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires. Why, you ask? To take away the power of monarchic dynasties from the states, separating them from the monarchical principle. And to give this principle together with the power of the oligarchs to business dynasties and business families. Without it, globalization would have been impossible. A political democracy with its elected puppets only covers this fraud, and has been doing so for more than a hundred years.

Third: It was the Great October that buried these plans, so the US did not ratify the Treaty of Versailles and did not join the League of Nations, which they themselves created. Since the victory of the West in the First World War was thus crossed out, a new course was taken -- the Second World War.

Fourth: The October revolution thus marked the failure of globalization No.1. The West unleashed a cold war in order to still run globalization project No.2, which is now implemented only because there was no force able to stop it.

Fifth, and last: The integration into the collective West of Nazi structures, which initially came out of it. As we have seen, the Third Reich with its new order was just a pilot project, a "dress rehearsal" of the "new world order." So global fascism, the establishment of which is the ultimate goal of globalization No. 2, is an extreme, globalist degree of malignant mutation of capitalism.

Here's the confirmation:

"I admire the English people. In the cause of colonization, it committed an unheard ... No people by their state and political qualities... Not fit to own an empire ... Since 1920, I have with all my tenacity ... tried to call a national movement in favor of ... an Alliance between Germany and England ... Two German Nations should have become friends already under the influence of natural instinct alone ... Only I, like the British, have enough cruelty to achieve the goal ... Our goal is not Danzig. Our main priority is to expand the living space in the East. And this space ... should become 'German India' …"

All we see today is the ascent of a Nazi "submarine" that has been lying at the bottom for more than 70 years. Only the same opponent's ascent submarine can stop this trend. This is the whole essence of the battle that has unfolded today -- foreign and domestic. The world is coming to its moment of truth. It is up to us whether we can make use of this opportunity and begin to eliminate the threats and challenges to security and disarmament which are facing the international community today.

Author: USA Really