Stories
Pentagon Developing New War Concept in Response to Threat From China and Russia
Next Post

Press {{ keys }} + D to make this page bookmarked.

Close

Pentagon Developing New War Concept in Response to Threat From China and Russia

392
olegponomar.com/PrtSc

WASHINGTON, DC – February 21, 2019

Earlier this month, US Naval Chief Admiral John Richardson appealed to Washington for an offensive against Russia and China. During an Atlantic Council conference, he accused Russia of blockading the Azov Sea and strengthening its military and naval presence in the Eastern Mediterranean. According to Richardson, Russia and China use the fleet for the aggressive seizure of land, seas and power, thus Richardson believes that for the US, “it’s time to strike first,” according to Business Insider.

Richardson is not the only general who says that America’s military is developing a new war-fighting concept in response to the threat of conflict with China, Russia, and other adversaries.

General David Goldfein told a Brookings Institution event on Tuesday that the US Army and Air Force would put forward the “concept of operations” within a year and would seek a $135 billion budget for “penetrating capability.” The US Marine Corps and Navy were also involved in the planning, the general said.

Goldfein’s remarks came as US officials warned that the gap between the US and Chinese militaries was narrowing and expressed concerns that China’s rise – backed by its stronger military muscle – would pose a threat to Washington’s leadership in global affairs.

China has stepped up the modernization of its military in recent years, but experts generally agreed that the People’s Liberation Army still lagged behind the US in areas such as air and naval forces as well as missile capabilities.

According to Goldfein, the stated purpose of the new concept was to carry out “stealth and joint penetration” in adversaries’ territories on land, in the air and at sea, causing simultaneous dilemmas for the opposing forces to effectively fight back.

In this joint penetrating team, Goldfein said the F-35, the US Air Force’s most advanced stealth fighter, would be the “quarterback” capable of fusing information from all sources and changing tactics in real time from inside enemy airspace.

“If a China or a Russia or an another adversary on the globe ever were to see a F-35 inside their airspace,” Goldfein said, “I would love to send them all messages with two words – ‘we’re here.’

“It’s not ‘I’m here,’” he said. “An F-35 will never be alone.”

Specifically, he said US special forces would be simultaneously “on the ground” and tactical submarines would be “below the surface” in such a scenario.

Goldfein also said the idea of this war-fighting concept “is that – we’re here; we’re here for a while; we’ve been watching you; we know what’s going on and we’ve already penetrated whatever the defences you think you have.”

“It’s about using our asymmetric advantage as a joint team to be able to bring all of our capabilities to bear on an adversary so that we can overwhelm them and cause so many simultaneous dilemmas for them that either they would choose not to take us on … or that they can’t counter [us],” he said.

In doing so, the US military would be able to “attack an enemy’s weaknesses as opposed to attacking their strengths,” Goldfein added. “It’s a fundamental change for us as much culturally as technically.”

Vice-Admiral Thomas Moore, who oversees the command of the US Navy's program for the construction of all surface and underwater systems, said on Tuesday that the development of various types of robotics for use on water, underwater and in the air is a key component of the further development of the US Navy.

In this regard, Moore confirmed that the US Navy is testing such autonomous systems "in all three environments: in the air, on the water and underwater." According to the vice-admiral, the appearance in the US Navy of ships without crews is "possible," but the unmanned aerial vehicles used as air refueling and reconnaissance aircraft will be "almost certainly” adopted for practical use. Nevertheless, the US Navy is still firmly not aware of "where they are moving in terms of the size of underwater uninhabited vehicles," Moore said.

Author: USA Really