Financial Bubbles: Mankind’s Greatest Madness
Next Post

Press {{ keys }} + D to make this page bookmarked.


Financial Bubbles: Mankind’s Greatest Madness


WASHINGTON, DC – March 19, 2019

The Yellow Vests revolt in France has revived the discussion around the revolutionary situation in a number of Western countries and the further development of modern capitalism. The main question is whether the collective West will be able to overcome the systemic crisis that was especially pronounced after the financial collapse of 2008?

Almost all observers point to the intellectual "impotence" of Western elites who are unable to meet the challenges of today. On the pages of the Spanish El Pais journalist Andrea Rizzi wrote: “After the crisis of 1929, US President Roosevelt launched the New Deal, after the Second World War, the Americans developed the Marshall Plan, and this literally saved the world capitalist system. What can Western leaders offer now when the signs of a systemic crisis are multiplying? The answer is obvious: for now, nothing. The caliber of current political leaders clearly does not reach the level of Roosevelt, de Gaulle and Adenauer. As a result, right-wing populists, nationalists, left-wing radicals are mastering the political space."

The only thing that financiers have been able to come up with is to freeze the growth of the key rate. At first, the Fed did it, sending a signal that it would raise the rate only once or even pause until the end of the year. And behind him last week, the ECB announced it would keep a record low interest rate for longer. The central banks of Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Brazil, Colombia, Taiwan, and Russia are also likely to keep rates.

Investors took this news enthusiastically, but they might soon regret it.

As John Mauldin points out in his article “This is How to Create the Biggest Credit Bubble in History:”

“This stimulus may indeed buy the market an additional year or two. But postponing the inevitable downturn with artificially low rates will come at a cost.

The cost is a massive credit bubble that is already of biblical proportions. Its implications chill me to the bone.”

According to Peter Boockvar — Chief Investment Officer of Bleakley Advisory Group: “We no longer have business cycles, we have credit cycles.”

It does not sound scary, but it is. The fact is that the economy is cyclical.

A growing economy peaks, contracts to a trough (what we call “recession”), recovers to enter prosperity, and hits a higher peak. Then the process repeats. The economy is always in either expansion or contraction.

This pattern broke down in the last decade.

We had an especially painful contraction followed by an extraordinarily weak expansion. GDP growth should reach 5% in the recovery and prosperity phases. It’s been around 3% (at best) since 2008.

Peter blames the Federal Reserve’s artificially low interest rates.

The problem is that over time, debt stops stimulating growth. Hence, the flat-to-mild recovery years.

Debt-fueled growth is fun at first but simply pulls forward future spending, which we then miss. Debt also boosts asset prices. That’s why stocks and real estate have performed so well.

If financing costs rise and buyers lack cash, the asset price must fall. And fall it will.

Further, since debt drives so much GDP growth, its cost (i.e., interest rates) is the main variable defining where we are in the cycle. The Fed controls that cost—or at least tries to—so we all obsess on central bank policy.

And rightly so.

Corporate Debt Disaster

In an old-style economic cycle, recessions triggered bear markets. Economic contraction slowed consumer spending, corporate earnings fell, and stock prices dropped.

That’s not how it works when the credit cycle is in control.

Lower asset prices aren’t the result of a recession. They cause the recession. That’s because access to credit drives consumer spending and business investment. Take it away and they decline.

Recession follows. 

The last credit crisis came from subprime mortgages. Those are getting problematic again. But today’s bigger risk is the sheer amount of corporate debt, especially high-yield bonds.

Corporate debt is now at a level that has not ended well in past cycles. Here’s a chart from Gluskin Sheff’s Dave Rosenberg:

Gluskin Sheff

The debt/GDP ratio could go higher still, but not much more. Whenever it falls, lenders (including bond fund and ETF investors) will want to sell. Then comes the hard part: to whom?

Liquidity Crisis

You see, it’s not just borrowers who’ve become accustomed to easy credit. Many lenders assume they can exit at a moment’s notice.

We have two related problems here:

Corporate debt issuance, especially high-yield debt, has exploded since 2009.

Tighter regulations discouraged banks from making markets in corporate and high-yield debt.

Both are problems, but the second is worse.

Experts say that Dodd-Frank requirements have reduced major banks’ market-making abilities by around 90%. For now, bond market liquidity is fine because hedge funds and other non-bank lenders have filled the gap.

The problem is they are not true market makers. Nothing requires them to hold inventory or to buy when you want to sell.

That means all the bids can “magically” disappear just when you need them most.

Worse, I don’t have enough exclamation points to describe the disaster when all high-yield funds try to sell at once and at fire-sale prices to meet redemptions.

In a bear market, you sell what you can, not what you want to. The picture will not be pretty.

Credit Collapse Will Lead to Recession

To make matters worse, many of these lenders are far more leveraged this time.

They bought their corporate bonds with money borrowed at record-low rates. And they’ll continue doing so as long as central banks keep them low.

To make matters even worse, most leveraged corporate bonds are what’s known as “covenant-lite.”

Put simply, the borrower doesn’t have to repay by conventional means. Sometimes it can even force the lender to take more debt.

As the economy enters recession, many companies will lose their ability to service debt. Normally, this would be the borrowers’ problem, but covenant-lite lenders took it on themselves.

This means the macroeconomic effects will spread even more widely.

Author: USA Really