News
Communist Party or any other totalitarian party members not allowed in the USA: New USCIS Guidance
Next Post

Press {{ keys }} + D to make this page bookmarked.

Close

Communist Party or any other totalitarian party members not allowed in the USA: New USCIS Guidance

1098

According to the U.S. Citizen and Immigration Service, there is never a “former” member of the ruling totalitarian party. Therefore, immigration officials will carefully screen out people who have ever had or are associated with the Communist Party or any other totalitarian party.

“The new policy manual section provides guidance on how to adjudicate inadmissibility due to membership in the Communist Party or any other totalitarian party in the context of adjustment of status applications,” says new guidance.

And although in the modern world there are no more totalitarian regimes, but only authoritarian ones, this does not apply to the United States, because the "Stronghold of Democracy" should suppress any other types of government.

Today, the most prominent representatives of authoritarian rule are the Arab Monarchies, North Korea, China, Iran, Libya. Cuba generally retained communism, although the unofficial name "Island of Freedom", the economy of this country was destroyed by the closest enemy of communism - the United States.

There are also countries with the latent authoritarian rule on our planet, such as Japan and Singapore. There are also representatives of military dictatorships, such as Pakistan, Egypt, and several Latin American countries.

The recently released guidelines do not clearly list the countries and parties that are prohibited from immigration to the United States, so now the sampling of aliens will be carried out for political reasons.

“On Oct. 2, USCIS issued policy guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual to address inadmissibility based on membership in or affiliation with the Communist Party or any other totalitarian party. Membership in or affiliation with the Communist Party or any other totalitarian party is inconsistent and incompatible with the Naturalization Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America, which includes pledging to “support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States.”

 

Author: Usa Really